Lab page

Selection of input jFETs for phono stage

Quiescent current

Voltage across the cascode

Matching of input jFETs

Heating the input jFETs ?

Back to main page

 

Selection of input jFETs for phono stage

Unfortunately many of the characteristics of jFETs show much greater process spread than corresponding characteristics of bipolar transistors. One solution to the problem are dual jFETs, especially in differential designs. In own measurements, the gate-source voltages UGS of both jFETS of a dual 2SK389 differed less than 2% (see table 1)*. However, between different 2SK389 there still is a large spread of UGS at a given drain current. Hence matching of the transistors is unavoidable (see paragraph on transistor matching below).

For a jFET moving coil head amplifier, low noise and high transconductance are mandatory. A BF246A has a transconductance 8mA/V (see data sheet) the dual 2SK 389 has 20mA/V which is good (see data sheet), the 2SK369 has a transconductance of 40mA/V and exceptional noise performance (see data sheet).

*Determination of UGS is described further down on this page.

Tab.1: Gate-source voltage at 5mA drain current, measured in five different dual jFETs 2SK389.

DUAL FET #

UGS

UGS

 

FET 1

FET 2

1

94.3

92.7

2

101.4

99.4

3

126.1

123.8

4

166.8

166.3

5

116.1

116.4

Conclusion: The 2SK369 is the first choice input transistor.

Parameter settings of the MC input stage.

Variables of the input stages in my application are

    • quiescent current
    • +rail voltage
    • voltage across the FET
    • voltage across the cascoding bipolar transistor
    • load resistor value

 

Quiescent current

For an MC input stage high gain and low noise can be considered the most important features. The calculated relationship between gain, +rail voltage, quiescent current are shown in figure 1. Although the transconductance slightly increases with rising quiescent current (fig. 2), the controlling factor is the load resistor value according to the equation

gain = transconductance x load resistor value                      (1)

click to enlarge

Fig.1: Calculated dependence of gain on supply voltage and quiescent current under the assumption of a given voltage of 15V across the cascode. The higher the voltage and the lower source-drain current, the higher the gain.

click to enlarge

Fig.2: Dependence of transconductance on quiescent current (taken from 2Sk369 data sheet). If the quiescent current is doubled from 5 to 10mA, the transconductance rises from 40 to 52mA/V.

From the equation 1 and from figure 1 it is obvious, that the maximum load resistance and hence the maximum gain is achieved by the highest + rail voltage possible and a lowest quiescent current acceptable. On the other hand at high quiescent currents the 2SK369 jFETs exhibits its best noise performance (fig. 3 and 4).

click to enlarge

Fig.3: Dependence of input noise voltage and quiescent current at UDS = 10V (data sheet).

cklick to enlarge

Fig.4: Dependence of noise figure and quiescent current at UDS = 10V (data sheet).

Conclusion: A compromise between transconductance and noise performance seems to be best at a quiescent current of 5mA.

Voltage across the cascode

In a cascode the voltage across the lower transistor is constant, independent from the input signal. Hence to ensure enough headroom for the load resistor and the cascoding transistor, the drain-source voltageof the 2SK369 jFETs should not be higher than needed. Besides, at drain-source voltages of 16V and 5mA quiescent current, the gate leakage current is around 10nA according to the 2SK369 data sheets  (fig. 5). At 8V the leakage current reduces by the factor of 1000 to give 10pA (though this is not a major problem due to the low input impedance of the cartrige).

So it is interesting to determine the lower limit of the drain-source voltage.

Determining the lower limit of UDS

To evaluate the lower limits of the drain-source voltage of the input jFET a potentiometer was added to the battery connected to the base of the cascoding transistors. Then the MK III preamp was wired into the audio system and the battery voltage lowered slowly starting at 9V (fig. 6, fig. 7, blue line).

cklick to enlarge

Fig.5: Dependence of gate leakage current drain-source voltage.

There was no audible change in sonic performance until the base input voltage reached 6V (green line in fig.7). Below 6V a rising tendency towards a compression of the sonic image and loss in depth could be noticed. Below 4.5V (red line in fig.7) the common mode rejection (CMR) degraded substantially and the system started to hum.

click to enlarge

Fig.6: Experimental setup to determine the lower limits of the drain-source voltage concerning the sonic performance of the input stage.

click to enlarge

Fig.7: Margins in drain-source voltage with noticeable changes of sonic performance of the input stage. Blue to green: no change, green to red: degradation in imaging, below red: degradation in CMR. (Please notice, that 0.7V are subtracted from the voltages measured at the potentiometer due to the loss across the pn-juction of the cascoding transistor)

The total voltage at the + rail equals 48V. With a quiescent current of 5mA there is a voltage drop of 23.5V across the 4.7kOhm load resistor. The voltage across the cascode is 48.0V - 23.5V = 24.5V. That leaves 24.5V - 8.3V = 16.2V for the upper cascoding transistor which has to deal with the voltage swing. In a non-feedback design it is desirable that the signal voltage swing at the collector is only a very small fraction of the voltage across the transistor in order to keep distortion to a minimum. If we assume an input voltage of 1mV from the MC cartrige, the voltage swing at the collector is around 100mV which is 160 times less than the voltage across the transistor.

Conclusion: The most suitable drain-source voltage is 8.3V (9V from the accumulator - 0.7V loss across the pn-junction of the cascoding transistor) .

Matching of input FETs

The schematic for the setup of matching the input FETs is shown in figure 8. Three FETs can be matched simultaneously. The BF246s are current sources (actually current sinks) for the FETs to be matched.

The BF246 were chosen for their high drain-source saturation current IDss > 30mA (see data sheet). So there is no risk of saturation and relatively high values of source resistors for self-biasing may be used. That improves the stability of the current source.

click to enlarge

Fig.8: Circuitry to match jFETs.

With the source resistors the constant currents for matching are set. For a current of 5mA the source resistor value measured is 427Ohm. However, to allow differing currents, the resistance may be trimmed and fine adjustment of the currents is necessary anyway. The 39Ohm resistors are for current measurement. They deliver a voltage drop of 195mV at 5mA, easy to measure with the 200mV range of a simple digital meter. The circuitry is powered by two 9V NiMH accumulators. So voltage and current and hence wattage dissipation during matching is almost identical to the parameters in the phono stage.

For matching a constant room temperature around 20°C is mandatory. The FETs were inserted into the sockets, the currents checked. Then the FETs were allowed to set to thermal equilibrium for 15 minutes. Afterwards the gate-source voltages were measured.

click to enlarge

Fig.9: Setup for matching jFETs.

click to enlarge

Fig.10: Distribution of gate-source voltages across the 2SK389 (n=5) and 2Sk269 (n=50) at constant drain currents of 5mA.

Conclusion: From a bulk of 50 2SK369 transistors it was easy to select closely matched pairs and quads.

Heating the input jFETs ?

This experiment was inspired by the discussion on memory distortion. The effect of memory distortion bases on the phenomenon, that the local crystal temperature in a transistor varies with signal amplitude passing through. With a heavy bass note passing through the transistor the local crystal temperature rises, affecting the transistor parameters. For a short time period the following signal "sees" these different parameters until the heat is dissipated into the bulk of the transistor body. Thus amplification of the momentary signal may be distorted by the signal that just had passed. The higher the temperature changes, the higher the potential memory distortion. At elevated crystal temperature signal the relative temperature changes induced and hence memory distortion should be smaller.

Memory distortion is extensively discussed on the web site: http://peufeu.free.fr/audio/

For the experiments two resistors were glued on the input jFETs and fed with DC from a lead gel accumulator until they reached around 50°C in a first experiment and 80°C in a second experiment. Listening tests were done by two independent persons. The differences in sonics at different temperatures (room temperature, 50°C, 80°C) were subtle but audible: The hotter the jFETs got, the worse the sonic performance.

 

Conclusion: For best performance the input jFETs should stay cool.

Fig.11: 560Ohm resistors glued on the input jFETs.

Back to top of the page

Back to Main Page